Toyota has been named by the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine for a number of models with "breaking axis doors"

It will take time for the Toyota Motor Corporation, which has just recovered from the global recall, to step out of the quagmire, and the company once again has been named by AQSIQ because of quality problems in China.

On the morning of August 29, the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine held a press conference. Li Yuanping, general manager of the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, and spokesman for the press released the basic conditions of product quality in the first half of this year. The report mentioned that more than half of the Toyota models such as the Toyota Camry, Reiz, and Prado had occurred. Broken axles, falling off, broken front brake discs, and broken brakes caused traffic accidents, resulting in greater casualties and property losses. In response to this, Toyota China spokesman Nguyen Nguyen said: "At present, Toyota is still understanding the situation. There is no other news to disclose."

"Collective" broken axis "AQSIQ named Toyota Motor quality problems, and hope to solve my lawsuit." Reiz owner Li Jianming told reporters that he is the victim of Toyota's "broken axis door." In February 2007, Li Jianming purchased Reiz. On January 26, 2009, Li Jianming drove to Jinggangshan, Jiangxi. During the period, he traveled at a speed of 100 kilometers per hour. Without any sign of warning, the car suddenly went out of control and drifted to the left. Then he stepped on the brakes, and the car went out of control and walked for a period of S-shape and stopped. Li Jianming stated that the left front wheel axle bearing of the car had been broken.

Toyota Camry

On the first day of work after the Spring Festival, Li Jianming submitted a complaint report on the breakdown of the vehicle bearing to the 4S shop and requested to immediately report to the manufacturer. On February 11th (16 days after the accident), Toyota sent a person to the Gansu-Guangdong Expressway in Jiangxi Province and found a 23-meter-long impact mark on the site. Therefore, the front axle was considered to be broken. Subsequently, Qi Zhong, the head of the South China Technology Department of FAW Toyota Motor Sales Co., Ltd., issued a handwritten appraisal result: “Yue A37××× Ruizhi Vehicles, through physical and on-site investigations, are accidents caused by non-product quality problems.”

The two parties were ineffective through mediation by the Guangzhou Consumer Council. On June 23 of that year, Li Jianming and the FAW Toyota and the distributor met in court in the Huangpu District People's Court of Guangzhou City. Li said that during the trial, the automobile agency for judicial appraisal of the People’s Court of Huangpu District of Guangzhou City issued a report for more than one year, and it did not qualify for qualification and refused to testify in court. The court sentenced Li Jianming to lose the case, and the case was subsequently transferred to the Guangzhou Intermediate People’s Court. Li Jianming said, "The case must be reopened, and it is hoped that the dispute over more than two years can have a fair view."

At major auto forums, the reporter found more cases concerning Toyota Motor's "breaking axis door" in China. For example, in March 2009, on the Suzhou section of the Yanjiang Expressway from Shanghai to Nantong, Zhang Hao drove the Camry on the road at a speed of 100 kilometers per hour. The rear right rear wheel of the car suddenly broke. Suzhou City Public Security Bureau Traffic Patrol Police Detachment Yanjiang Expressway Brigade Accident Division commissioned Suzhou City Traffic Police Patrol Detachment Vehicle Administration Institute to identify the accident vehicle. The conclusion was: “The right rear axle of the vehicle (part number: 8505C) was suddenly broken during driving. The quality of the product is in doubt.” In addition, similar incidents occurred in the Toyota Prado (Prado). On October 28, 2008, a BMW B66636 was overbearing by 3400, and it was normally driven to the 158km of the S211 highway in Inner Mongolia. Suddenly the shaft was broken. The overturned roundabout caused a major single-sided traffic accident with two deaths and one injury. The off-axis incident even spread to Lexus. The Lexus owner of the Beijing Leighton purchased the Lexus ES350, which had been running for less than 40,000 kilometers, for more than two years. At low speeds, the front axle suddenly broke and caused a car accident.

The cause of the defect in bearing quality Toyota Motor’s handling of multiple cases denied quality issues. Ma Chunping, director of public relations at FAW Toyota, said that he was surprised by the AQSIQ’s name. The company’s internal background through the complaints query the customer’s situation. In the complaints information of the past two years, only two cases of complaints had a half-axis fracture, due to collisions caused by traffic accidents. Axial fractures do not result from accidents due to breakage of the axles.

However, the accreditation center report and the Toyota recall record point to the quality of automotive bearings. According to "China Quality Miles" last year, a lawyer named Jiang Jianping had 19 indirect hands with Toyota Motor Co., Ltd. in the past 10 years. The involved vehicles are the Camry and overbearing vehicles of the Toyota family. Prado) and Reiz. In 19 accidents, there were 13 "broken axis" incidents, including 7 from Toyota Camry broken shaft and 8 broken shafts; 3 from Toyota overbearing broken shaft and 4 broken shafts; 3 from Toyota Toshiba breaking shaft and 3 broken shafts. root. Among them, Fujian Zhongke Judicial Identification Center identified two accidents, both of which were called "Half-axis quality defects caused the normal rear axle to break and overturn." In addition, in many automobile websites and forums, many Toyota owners released rights protection information, posted images and related passages including half-axis breaks such as Camry and Reiz, and pointed to the broken axis as a “quality problem”.

Judging from the recall case, Toyota Motor has repeatedly recalled the semi-axis problem. In 2006, Toyota took part in the Toyota Prado which was produced from April 17, 1996 to January 6, 1999. “The reason for the lack of strength due to the design/manufacturing process of the rear axle flange is insufficient. The recall was made on the grounds that the Camry and Reiz, two of the newer models held in large numbers in China, had been recalled. Toyota also stated in the recalled communique that Prado, which was produced from January 7 to January 1999, used a modified half axle, but the problem of Prado in domestic use during this period is still problematic.

On June 1st this year, Toyota Motor Corporation announced that it recalled some 2011 VENZA and SIENNA passenger cars that were produced between March 7 and March 10 this year in the United States. The cause of the recall was "due to the four-wheel drive (4WD) vehicles. Improper heat treatment of the right front half shaft may lead to insufficient strength.The part may break during use, leading to the vehicle unable to drive.Analysts pointed out that Toyota’s recall in the United States shows that the importance of the US market.For the same problem, even into In the Chinese market where many casualties occurred, Toyota lacked sincerity in solving automotive quality problems.