In the security industry, no industry has more stringent security requirements than the airport. No industry has more applications than the airport; no industry is more advanced than the airport; however, no industry is better than the airport. There are more problems.

Integrated security management encounters a bottleneck

Recalling the development of the security market and security products over the past few years, they complement each other. The ever-increasing security needs have stimulated the emergence of new security technologies, and newer products have become more attractive to the market. Therefore, we have seen IP cameras, fully switched networks, 4K polar cameras, ultra-wide dynamics, ultra-low illumination cameras, and optical network access. These new products and technologies are new. However, these new products and new technologies do not really solve the pain points of airport security management and are plagued by itching. A detailed analysis revealed that it is actually not new, but the technologies in other industries have been repackaged in security products. This is not a 'take-in' approach to the development of the disease prevention technology. Rather, it is 'produced' with a greater emphasis on 'singularity' and 'hardware'.

Because simple hardware combinations do not represent business applications, the difficulty at airports is to combine these hardware and intelligence to form management applications.

Several airport security integration cases

A domestic airport A, after adopting an internationally known access control system and monitoring system, built an advanced security system. There is also a need to add a channel authentication function, by swiping cards, invoking the images under surveillance, as well as images registered in the system, and having them checked by the management staff. It has been developed several times. Due to the complexity of access control systems and monitoring systems and the large number of BUGs in the database, it is difficult to use them. This means that the original system can not meet the customer's application and can be realized through a customized method. However, the customer also assumes the risk of software instability caused by customization.

Two airports in a domestic city need centralized information collection and centralized security information. Since the same brand of equipment is used, information between two different airports is achieved through database synchronization. Because the database synchronization will Affects the operation of real-time business, so it cannot be achieved during peak hours of airport operation. Therefore, the data synchronization mechanism is set to complete in the early hours of the day and the passenger flow is extremely small, which basically meets the needs of customers. However, due to the inherent mechanism of using the original system, its flexibility is greatly constrained. Imagine if the operation of the airport does not allow any emphasis on the business, data synchronization in this way will not be realized, and the unified management of the two airports will be limited.

At a domestic airport B, access control and video surveillance systems were set up, and access control alarm linkage videos were set up. Its realization mechanism is through the access control system's own custom string protocol to communicate, so as to avoid the risk of software instability caused by development.

It also increases the flexibility of project implementation. However, because the access control system provides sufficient flexibility and the video system lacks flexibility, customers have to manage incidents in video surveillance through the access control system. This, and its inconformity with the airport's usage habits, is the use of video platforms for intuitive management. Security incident. Since the access control and video surveillance systems have been completed, the functional requirements of customers cannot be realized using existing systems. Finally, it is necessary to optimize the management by building a security platform. This is the result of the unreasonable selection of typical products. The airport often focuses on the functions of the single system when selecting the system. It ignores the flexibility of the external system, increases the difficulty of future management, and increases the number of retrofits. the cost of.

The above example shows that each airport has its own unique business needs, which must be achieved through security and integration customization. However, unreasonable security integration methods have drawbacks. The integration of different subsystems in the airport, and the endless accumulation of problems, illustrate the urgency of comprehensive security management of these issues. It is no wonder that airport customers are even willing to combine product manufacturers to solve problems with research methods.

The componentized security integration platform is componentized. This is a very mature concept in the field of automation. We are no strangers to it. However, it is so far away from the security industry. Mentioned earlier, when security companies pursued 'acquisitionism', they only paid attention to hardware and ignored software. When Niklaus Wirth proposed 'software = data structure + algorithm', it also gave us the theoretical basis for a comprehensive component platform for the security industry.

In the security industry, various subsystem manufacturers are advancing their own products. While improving their functions, they also provide SDKs and APIs with rich interfaces and functions.

The amount of attention in the security system is mostly the amount of switching, that is, the amount of state. Through the SDK and API, these switch information management.

These state quantities include: access control switches, exit button switches, alarm point triggering and non-triggered, defense zone disarming and deployment, video point offline and online, video line analysis, video analysis area occupancy, patrol Point triggers, etc.

These state quantities can be understood as the 'data structure' in the 'software = data structure + algorithm' formula. The 'algorithm' is the most basic 'and' or 'not'.

The Resolution of Airport Security Integration

The integration of data, as well as the abstraction of the business, is the result of all security needs. And both of these aspects will be the core of the competitiveness of security companies in the future and the breakthrough point for airport security platforms. There are only a handful of Chinese manufacturers that can integrate resources, and there is no such thing as the integration of resources into flexible applications.

The various data in airport security applications are abstracted into the smallest data units. These units are structured units. By combining these units in an arbitrary combination of 'event' logic, any data can be The combination of relationships and business combinations.

Understanding these mechanisms provides the basis for manufacturers to develop a common component security integration platform.

Maybe in the near future, we can see that through the joint efforts of airport customers and vendors, organic and orderly systems will be integrated in an organic and orderly manner to meet the needs of different users and management efficiency in different scenarios. . Users are also out of the use of high-tech, high-performance, new technology products will be able to achieve the rigors of flexible and secure applications; manufacturers will only go out by simply improving performance, reduce prices to win the market misunderstanding.

Release date:2015/1/30 16:46:27

Steel Metal Sheet Fabrication

Steel Metal Sheet Fabrication,Sheet Metal Fabrication,Sheet Metal Fabrication Processing,Metal Laser Cutting Service

Foshan Tanghan Precision Metal Products Co., Ltd. , https://www.utetrayandcanopy.com